A question buyers ask AI

How do newsletter platforms differ in their drag-and-drop email campaign builders, especially for teams that want to use custom HTML when they need it?

Measured in 1 answer, last on Nov 10, 2026. Only the passages that name a brand are shown.

Brands in the answers

BrandNamed inRecommended inPositiveAvg. position
Klaviyo100%100%100%1
Brevo100%100%100%2
Stripo100%100%100%3
Mailchimp100%0%0%—
Campaign Monitor100%0%0%—
Beefree100%0%100%—

Where each answer names a brand

Answer 1 · Nov 10, 2026 · 6 sources cited
Klaviyo#1Recommendedpositive
“### 1. Klaviyo: strongest hybrid approach”
+ hybrid templates

“Its particularly interesting feature is the ability to create hybrid templates.”

+ drag-and-drop editing for marketers

“- Drag-and-drop editing for marketers.”

+ dedicated HTML editor

“- A dedicated HTML editor for fully custom emails.”

+ HTML blocks

“- HTML blocks for inserting custom-coded elements into visual templates.”

− custom HTML requires technical knowledge

“Trade-off: Custom HTML requires technical knowledge, and Klaviyo notes that its support team doesn't provide full custom-template development assistance.”

Brevo#2RecommendedSite citedpositive
“### 2. Brevo: good flexibility without a complicated workflow”
+ HTML blocks

“- HTML blocks: Insert custom HTML within a visually designed email.”

+ complete HTML uploads

“- HTML custom-code editor: Upload an entire HTML email created externally.”

+ developer mode

“- Developer mode: Access additional design customization through a YAML-based editor integrated into the visual builder.”

− inconsistent HTML/CSS support

“Trade-off: Some HTML and CSS features aren't supported consistently by email clients, and developer mode doesn't support every CSS property.”

Stripo#3RecommendedSite citedpositive
+ visual editing and HTML access

“A dedicated email design platform with visual editing and HTML access.”

+ reusable templates and export

“Useful for building reusable templates and exporting them to different email marketing platforms.”

MailchimpSite citedmixed
“### 3. Mailchimp: approachable, but watch the builder distinction”
+ familiar visual editing experience

“Mailchimp has a familiar visual editing experience, with templates and content blocks for text, images, products, social links and other content.”

+ custom HTML code blocks

“It also supports custom HTML through code blocks.”

− new builder lacks custom-coded template creation

“- The new builder does not support creating custom-coded templates in the same way as the legacy builder.”

− restricted legacy builder availability

“Mailchimp's legacy builder availability is also restricted for some newer accounts.”

Campaign MonitorSite citedmixed
“### 4. Campaign Monitor: strong separation between visual and coded workflows”
+ clean visual editor

“Campaign Monitor provides a clean visual editor designed around reusable layouts and content blocks.”

+ editable regions in imported templates

“Imported templates can contain designated editable regions, allowing marketers to change specific text and image content without rebuilding the entire email.”

− no HTML editing or export from visual builder

“However, there's an important limitation: emails created in the visual builder cannot have their HTML directly edited or exported.”

BeefreeSite citedpositive
+ reusable designs and collaborative production

“A visual email builder designed for reusable designs and collaborative production.”

+ structured approval workflows

“Particularly interesting for agencies and teams with more structured approval workflows.”

Sources the answers cite

← All questions and the Newsletter & Publishing Platforms ranking