A question buyers ask AI

Are there any prototyping tools that let us run unmoderated user testing sessions without having to buy a separate research platform?

Measured in 1 answer, last on Nov 10, 2026. Only the passages that name a brand are shown.

Brands in the answers

BrandNamed inRecommended inPositiveAvg. position
Figma100%0%0%—
ProtoPie100%0%0%—
Framer100%0%0%—
Axure RP100%0%0%—
Marvel100%0%0%—
Sketch100%0%0%—
Maze100%0%0%—
Lyssna100%0%0%—
Useberry100%0%0%—
Ballpark100%0%0%—

Where each answer names a brand

Answer 1 · Nov 10, 2026 · 6 sources cited
“Are you looking specifically for: A. A prototyping tool like Figma, Framer or ProtoPie that has unmoderated testing built directly into the product?”
ProtoPieSite citedmixed
“ProtoPie introduced its own User Testing functionality in April 2026.”
+ captures interaction logs, session replays and task outcomes

“It captures interaction logs, session replays and task outcomes.”

− native testing is moderator-led rather than unmoderated

“ProtoPie | Worth investigating, but its native testing is moderator-led rather than genuinely unmoderated.”

“Are you looking specifically for: A. A prototyping tool like Figma, Framer or ProtoPie that has unmoderated testing built directly into the product?”
“It integrates with Figma and supports Axure.”
MarvelSite citedmixed
“Marvel has built-in user-testing functionality, including recorded testing.”
+ built-in user-testing functionality

“Marvel has built-in user-testing functionality, including recorded testing.”

− user-testing functionality partly transitioned to Ballpark

“One important caveat: Marvel's current documentation indicates that its user-testing functionality has partly transitioned to its sister product, Ballpark.”

“- Integration with Figma, ProtoPie and Sketch.”
MazeSite citedmixed
“Although it's a separate research platform rather than a prototyping tool, Maze is worth considering because it offers:”
+ structured usability testing

“### 3. Maze — best for structured usability testing”

+ task-based usability testing

“- Task-based usability testing.”

+ success and completion rates

“- Success and completion rates.”

+ heatmaps and misclick analysis

“- Heatmaps and misclick analysis.”

+ A/B testing of prototypes

“- A/B testing of prototypes.”

+ participant recruitment options

“- Participant recruitment options.”

+ Figma integration and Axure support

“It integrates with Figma and supports Axure.”

− requires a separate platform

“Maze | Excellent testing functionality, but requires a separate platform.”

Lyssnamixed
“### 4. Lyssna — best for lightweight testing”
+ unmoderated prototype testing

“- Unmoderated prototype testing.”

+ screen and audio recordings

“- Screen and audio recordings.”

+ first-click testing

“- First-click testing.”

+ five-second tests

“- Five-second tests.”

+ preference testing

“- Preference testing.”

+ recruitment through own audience or participant panel

“- Recruitment through your own audience or its participant panel.”

+ prototype testing available on free plan

“One useful detail: its prototype testing is available on the free plan.”

− separate platform

“Lyssna | Good lightweight alternative, but also a separate platform.”

UseberrySite citedmixed
“### 5. Useberry — best for Figma-centric teams”
+ task-based usability tests

“- Task-based usability tests.”

+ click tracking and heatmaps

“- Click tracking and heatmaps.”

+ open-ended feedback

“- Open-ended feedback.”

+ A/B testing

“- A/B testing.”

+ integration with Figma, ProtoPie and Sketch

“- Integration with Figma, ProtoPie and Sketch.”

+ participant recruitment through integrated participant pools

“It also supports participant recruitment through integrated participant pools.”

− separate platform

“Useberry | Good Figma integration, but also a separate platform.”

BallparkSite cited
“Marvel's current documentation indicates that its user-testing functionality has partly transitioned to its sister product, Ballpark.”

Sources the answers cite

← All questions and the UI/UX Prototyping ranking