A question buyers ask AI

We're a two-person team building a web app with logins, file uploads, and a small database — which backend-as-a-service would be a good fit?

Measured in 1 answer, last on Nov 12, 2026. Only the passages that name a brand are shown.

Brands in the answers

BrandNamed inRecommended inPositiveAvg. position
Supabase100%100%100%1
Firebase100%0%0%2
Appwrite100%0%0%3
Convex100%0%0%4

Where each answer names a brand

Answer 1 · Nov 12, 2026 · 4 sources cited
Supabase#1RecommendedSite citedpositive
“I'd recommend starting with Supabase.”
+ integrated platform

“you get authentication, a relational database, file storage, and APIs in one platform.”

+ managed PostgreSQL

“Database: Fully managed PostgreSQL.”

+ SQL flexibility

“SQL is flexible and widely understood.”

+ no proprietary lock-in

“You aren't locked into a proprietary database format.”

+ no backend server maintenance

“You can build without maintaining your own backend server.”

+ generous free tier

“It has a generous free tier for experimentation.”

Firebase#2Site citedmixed
“Firebase — Best for Google ecosystem integration”
+ SDKs

“Excellent SDKs.”

+ mobile app support

“Great mobile app support.”

+ mature infrastructure

“Mature infrastructure.”

− unpredictable pricing

“Usage-based pricing can become harder to predict.”

− Google ecosystem dependence

“Greater dependence on Google's ecosystem.”

− NoSQL instead of relational SQL

“Firestore uses NoSQL rather than traditional relational SQL.”

Appwrite#3Site citedmixed
“Appwrite — Best open-source alternative”
+ open source

“Open source.”

+ self-hosting

“Can self-host.”

+ SDKs

“Good collection of SDKs.”

+ integrated platform

“One integrated platform.”

− less suited for relational data

“I'd lean toward Supabase if you expect relational data and want the flexibility of PostgreSQL.”

“Convex — Worth considering if your app is particularly interactive and TypeScript-centric.”

Sources the answers cite

← All questions and the Backend-as-a-Service ranking