“My assessment: Supabase is particularly worth evaluating if you want relational data, flexible permissions, and database-enforced tenant isolation without building the entire backend infrastructure yourself.”
“- PostgreSQL-native row-level security.”
“- SQL-based authorization policies.”
“- Integration with Supabase Auth.”
“- Custom JWT claims.”
“- Storage policies.”
“- Database-level enforcement.”
“For example, Supabase's service_role credentials bypass RLS.”
“Its documentation also highlights that views can bypass RLS unless configured appropriately.”
“A good candidate if your application is built around document-oriented data and real-time functionality.”
“- Firebase Authentication.”
“- Firestore Security Rules.”
“- Custom claims and role-based permissions.”
“- Document-level access control.”
“- Integration with other Google Cloud services.”
“However, be careful with server-side access: Firestore server client libraries bypass Firestore Security Rules and require separate IAM-based authorization.”
“Complex authorization relationships can also become harder to manage as your application grows.”
“Worth evaluating if you're already invested in the AWS ecosystem.”
“- Authentication and identity management.”
“- Group-based authorization.”
“- Resource-level access policies.”
“- Integration with AWS services.”
“- Custom authorization logic.”
“For reference, Intercom's reporting documentation describes combined human and AI support reporting, while Zendesk's reporting metrics documentation covers response times, resolution times, customer satisfaction, backlog, and SLA performance.”
“For reference, Intercom's reporting documentation describes combined human and AI support reporting, while Zendesk's reporting metrics documentation covers response times, resolution times, customer satisfaction, backlog, and SLA performance.”