“Excellent databases and structured information.”
“Powerful collaboration.”
“Flexible organization.”
“Main consideration: its workspace structure is more dependent on Notion's proprietary platform. Exporting doesn't perfectly reproduce the original workspace.”
“For a ten-year horizon, I'd put Obsidian and Joplin near the top of my shortlist, primarily because of their approach to local storage and portable notes.”
“Excellent for longevity”
“Stores notes as ordinary Markdown files.”
“Local-first architecture.”
“Links and backlinks.”
“Large plugin ecosystem.”
“Main consideration: some advanced features rely on Obsidian-specific functionality.”
“Open-source knowledge management.”
“Local-first approach.”
“Markdown and Org-mode support.”
“Particularly good for interconnected notes and outlining.”
“Main consideration: its block-based organization and evolving features can make migration more complicated.”
“For a ten-year horizon, I'd put Obsidian and Joplin near the top of my shortlist, primarily because of their approach to local storage and portable notes.”
“Open source.”
“Markdown-based notes.”
“Offline access.”
“Attachments and notebooks.”
“Multiple synchronization options.”
“Main consideration: its internal data organization is more application-dependent than a simple Markdown folder.”