“Excellent for sophisticated, multi-section websites. Offers visual Flexbox and CSS Grid controls, reusable classes, components, and detailed responsive settings.”
“You can build complex layouts without relying on arbitrary positioning.”
“Downside: Steeper learning curve.”
“You get substantial design freedom while retaining tools that help maintain layout consistency.”
“Downside: Its extensive controls take some time to master.”
“Very enjoyable for designing visually. Particularly good for building attractive, modern pages quickly.”
“Downside: Less suitable than Webflow for very complex, content-heavy website structures.”
“You can build very long pages visually and reuse design elements throughout your website.”
“Downside: Poorly configured themes, plugins, and nested containers can make layouts harder to maintain.”
“Consistent spacing and alignment, with less opportunity to accidentally create chaotic layouts.”
“Downside: Less freedom for unusual or highly customized page structures.”